Blog / Real Estate Litigation

Blog

All Real Estate Litigation Commercial Leases investment Partnerships Firm News Risk Management Business Law Real Estate Law Landlord Tenant Law Local Ordinances Contract Disputes Insurance Law Real Estate Transactions

How landlords can deal with chronically noisy tenants

Everybody dreads living near a person who makes lots of noise at all hours of the day and night on a regular basis. When you live in an apartment, there seems to be no way to escape this individual’s blaring music, parties that last until the wee hours or boisterous kids and their friends. You like to think of your home as a peaceful oasis, but all too often, being there is a nerve-wracking experience. Tuning out all the sounds that grate on you is simply impossible. Griping about it all the time doesn’t help, either. If you are a landlord in California with a tenant like that, you know the frustration and even anger this person can cause for you and other, quieter tenants. In fact, according to the website The Balance Small Business,“ Noise is one of the most common complaints a landlord will get from tenants.” You need to find out what reasonable means are available to you for dealing with this person and resolving the issue. Noises tenants make that often result in complaints This is a partial list of objectionable noises that tenants make: Shouting Large indoor or outdoor social gatherings Not controlling a barking dog Having the TV turned up far too loud Children running overhead, shrieking or crying loudly What actions can a landlord take? Landlords have options, as well as a responsibility to look into the troublesome situation. Here are some tips on what you can do: Find out more from the tenant who is complaining about the noise. Get as many details as possible. Discuss the situation with other tenants to see if they have anything to add. Talk to the noisy tenant. Issuing a warning may be enough to quiet the person down. Having a clause about excessive or repeated noise in tenants’ leases is a good idea. If the tenant is in violation of the terms of their lease by continuing to make noise, they can be evicted. If you are a landlord facing this problem and you aren’t sure how to address it, get some legal advice.

How landlords can deal with chronically noisy tenants

Everybody dreads living near a person who makes lots of noise at all hours of the day and night on a regular basis. When you live in an apartment, there seems to be no way to escape this individual’s blaring music, parties that last until the wee hours or boisterous kids and their friends. You like to think of your home as a peaceful oasis, but all too often, being there is a nerve-wracking experience. Tuning out all the sounds that grate on you is simply impossible. Griping about it all the time doesn’t help, either. If you are a landlord in California with a tenant like that, you know the frustration and even anger this person can cause for you and other, quieter tenants. In fact, according to the website The Balance Small Business,“ Noise is one of the most common complaints a landlord will get from tenants.” You need to find out what reasonable means are available to you for dealing with this person and resolving the issue. Noises tenants make that often result in complaints This is a partial list of objectionable noises that tenants make: Shouting Large indoor or outdoor social gatherings Not controlling a barking dog Having the TV turned up far too loud Children running overhead, shrieking or crying loudly What actions can a landlord take? Landlords have options, as well as a responsibility to look into the troublesome situation. Here are some tips on what you can do: Find out more from the tenant who is complaining about the noise. Get as many details as possible. Discuss the situation with other tenants to see if they have anything to add. Talk to the noisy tenant. Issuing a warning may be enough to quiet the person down. Having a clause about excessive or repeated noise in tenants’ leases is a good idea. If the tenant is in violation of the terms of their lease by continuing to make noise, they can be evicted. If you are a landlord facing this problem and you aren’t sure how to address it, get some legal advice.

Real estate dispute may involve boundary lines

Arguments between neighbors are sometimes inevitable, particularly when they involve property boundaries. Unfortunately, these arguments can quickly escalate, causing extra problems for both parties. In these real estate dispute situations in Los Angeles, seeking a solution through the court system may be the only option for addressing these issues. Property surveys are completed when properties are purchased and ideally should reveal the properties’ boundary lines. However, two neighbors may not agree on where the lines are, and obtaining a survey that is updated may not be possible for various reasons — for example, due to the property deed’s wording or the property’s age. In this situation, a neighbor may ask a judge to determine the property’s boundary lines, through what is called a quiet title lawsuit. Another option when tackling a property boundary dispute is for the two neighbors to come to an agreement on a certain object that will be their boundary line. This object may be a tree or a fence, for example. Then, both neighbors can sign a legal document known as a quitclaim deed, which would grant each person ownership of the land on his or her side of the agreed-upon object. Real estate dispute situations can easily happen if a homeowner decides to start a building or gardening project near what he or she believes to be the edge of his or her property, for example. An attorney can provide the guidance needed to navigate these disputes, including filing a quiet title lawsuit or preparing a quitclaim deed. The attorney’s goal in Los Angeles is to make sure that one’s best interests and property rights are protected in the Golden State. Source: findlaw.com, “ Boundary Disputes “, Accessed on Nov. 14, 2017

Real estate dispute may involve boundary lines

Arguments between neighbors are sometimes inevitable, particularly when they involve property boundaries. Unfortunately, these arguments can quickly escalate, causing extra problems for both parties. In these real estate dispute situations in Los Angeles, seeking a solution through the court system may be the only option for addressing these issues. Property surveys are completed when properties are purchased and ideally should reveal the properties’ boundary lines. However, two neighbors may not agree on where the lines are, and obtaining a survey that is updated may not be possible for various reasons — for example, due to the property deed’s wording or the property’s age. In this situation, a neighbor may ask a judge to determine the property’s boundary lines, through what is called a quiet title lawsuit. Another option when tackling a property boundary dispute is for the two neighbors to come to an agreement on a certain object that will be their boundary line. This object may be a tree or a fence, for example. Then, both neighbors can sign a legal document known as a quitclaim deed, which would grant each person ownership of the land on his or her side of the agreed-upon object. Real estate dispute situations can easily happen if a homeowner decides to start a building or gardening project near what he or she believes to be the edge of his or her property, for example. An attorney can provide the guidance needed to navigate these disputes, including filing a quiet title lawsuit or preparing a quitclaim deed. The attorney’s goal in Los Angeles is to make sure that one’s best interests and property rights are protected in the Golden State. Source: findlaw.com, “ Boundary Disputes “, Accessed on Nov. 14, 2017

Real estate litigation may involve mortgage fraud

Purchasing a home can understandably be an exciting process for all parties involved, but fraudulent activity can quickly cast a dark cloud over this process. Specifically, mortgage fraud may occur, leading to real estate litigation. Those who are negatively impacted by mortgage fraud in Los Angeles, such as mortgage lenders and brokers, have the right to pursue justice through the civil court system. Mortgage fraud refers to a variety of illegal schemes that involve misstatement or misrepresentation on mortgage documents. For instance, a home buyer or a mortgage broker might submit false W-2 forms. In addition, a real estate professional might obtain a property appraisal that is inflated. Two chief types of mortgage fraud exist. One is called fraud for profit, where a real estate appraiser or a mortgage broker, for example, engage in fraudulent activity to extract funds from a transaction or property. The other type is called fraud for housing, which is where a home borrower provides inaccurate, false or incomplete information to qualify for a home loan or to enjoy more personally favorable terms when purchasing a house. Those involved in mortgage fraud may be charged and end up being convicted in the criminal justice system. However, they might also be held financially responsible for the monetary damages that lenders incur as a result of the fraud. A civil claim filed with the help of an attorney in Los Angeles who focuses on real estate litigation might be based on deceit and/or misrepresentation, contractual theories, a breach of trust or conspiring to defraud a lender. Appraisers and mortgage brokers are third parties who may also be liable for monetary damages in a civil mortgage fraud lawsuit. Source: findlaw.com, “ Mortgage Fraud “, Accessed on May 15, 2017

Real estate litigation may involve mortgage fraud

Purchasing a home can understandably be an exciting process for all parties involved, but fraudulent activity can quickly cast a dark cloud over this process. Specifically, mortgage fraud may occur, leading to real estate litigation. Those who are negatively impacted by mortgage fraud in Los Angeles, such as mortgage lenders and brokers, have the right to pursue justice through the civil court system. Mortgage fraud refers to a variety of illegal schemes that involve misstatement or misrepresentation on mortgage documents. For instance, a home buyer or a mortgage broker might submit false W-2 forms. In addition, a real estate professional might obtain a property appraisal that is inflated. Two chief types of mortgage fraud exist. One is called fraud for profit, where a real estate appraiser or a mortgage broker, for example, engage in fraudulent activity to extract funds from a transaction or property. The other type is called fraud for housing, which is where a home borrower provides inaccurate, false or incomplete information to qualify for a home loan or to enjoy more personally favorable terms when purchasing a house. Those involved in mortgage fraud may be charged and end up being convicted in the criminal justice system. However, they might also be held financially responsible for the monetary damages that lenders incur as a result of the fraud. A civil claim filed with the help of an attorney in Los Angeles who focuses on real estate litigation might be based on deceit and/or misrepresentation, contractual theories, a breach of trust or conspiring to defraud a lender. Appraisers and mortgage brokers are third parties who may also be liable for monetary damages in a civil mortgage fraud lawsuit. Source: findlaw.com, “ Mortgage Fraud “, Accessed on May 15, 2017

Real estate dispute may involve easement Part II

Easements are one area of real estate that can be confusing for both residential and commercial buyers. A major question posed in a real estate dispute involving an easement, or the right to use a particular piece of land, is whether it is implied or express. The chief difference between the two is that an implied easement in Los Angeles or another part of California is created through particular circumstances, whereas an express one arises from a document or agreement. Express easements are created by wills or deeds. Therefore, they have to be in writing. They can also be formed when the owners of certain properties convey their land to others but save or reserve easements in them. Implied easements exist when there are no particular agreements or documents creating them. There are three requirements for having these types of easements. First, they have to be reasonable necessary for the original pieces of property to be able to be enjoyed. Second, the land has to be split so that a parcel’s owner is either selling a part and retaining the other party, or is subdividing the land and then selling parts to various new owners. Finally, the reason for the use of the easement must have existed before the sale or severance took place. In some cases, a real estate dispute may arise regarding whether an easement exists or not. In other cases, a business or individual may wish to create one. In addition, some people or businesses might want to buy properties that have been burdened by them. In any of these situations, an attorney experienced in real estate law can help to protect one’s best interests in Los Angeles and elsewhere in California. Source: findlaw.com, “ Express and Implied Easements “, Accessed on March 15, 2017

Real estate dispute may involve easement Part II

Easements are one area of real estate that can be confusing for both residential and commercial buyers. A major question posed in a real estate dispute involving an easement, or the right to use a particular piece of land, is whether it is implied or express. The chief difference between the two is that an implied easement in Los Angeles or another part of California is created through particular circumstances, whereas an express one arises from a document or agreement. Express easements are created by wills or deeds. Therefore, they have to be in writing. They can also be formed when the owners of certain properties convey their land to others but save or reserve easements in them. Implied easements exist when there are no particular agreements or documents creating them. There are three requirements for having these types of easements. First, they have to be reasonable necessary for the original pieces of property to be able to be enjoyed. Second, the land has to be split so that a parcel’s owner is either selling a part and retaining the other party, or is subdividing the land and then selling parts to various new owners. Finally, the reason for the use of the easement must have existed before the sale or severance took place. In some cases, a real estate dispute may arise regarding whether an easement exists or not. In other cases, a business or individual may wish to create one. In addition, some people or businesses might want to buy properties that have been burdened by them. In any of these situations, an attorney experienced in real estate law can help to protect one’s best interests in Los Angeles and elsewhere in California. Source: findlaw.com, “ Express and Implied Easements “, Accessed on March 15, 2017

Real estate dispute involving Catholic nuns and pop singer

A group of nuns recently lost their legal effort to prevent pop singer Katy Perry from buying their former convent. After this last ruling, the singer is now one step closer to being able to move into the beautiful property, something she has been trying to do since 2015. The property includes fountains, several buildings and a church. Through her limited liability company (LLC), Perry first offered to pay $14.5 million for the eight-acre estate to turn it into her private residence in Los Angeles. Details of a sale gone wrong But before she could go into escrow, the following things occurred that delayed the timely transfer of the property into her possession: Two nuns from the Sisters of the Most Holy and Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary made a quick deal with another private buyer. The sale to the second buyer closed quickly to prevent the sale by the archdiocese to Perry. The closed sale of the property did not have the necessary written approval from either the L.A. archdiocese or the pope, ultimately rendering it an invalid transaction. A Los Angeles Superior Court ruled against the nuns, yet the local archdiocese says that this is ultimately the best outcome for them. While this interesting case did technically pit the nuns against the archdiocese, the voided transaction came with only a small initial payment. The second buyer initially paid the nuns $44,000 and signed a promissory note for the rest, about $9 million. According to details known about the case and the terms of the contract, the invalid sale did not necessarily guarantee that the sisters would have ever received the rest of the amount owed. How you can avoid similar complications It is not every day that a dispute over a real estate transaction involves a group of nuns and a well-known pop star, but this case underlines the importance of working closely with an attorney to avoid similar complications. You or your business would be wise to approach the purchase and sale of valuable and complex properties only with qualified legal guidance and protective contractual provisions. A careful drafting and review of any contract is a positive effort toward avoiding disputes and legal complications that may prevent you from reaching your legal objectives.

Real estate dispute involving Catholic nuns and pop singer

A group of nuns recently lost their legal effort to prevent pop singer Katy Perry from buying their former convent. After this last ruling, the singer is now one step closer to being able to move into the beautiful property, something she has been trying to do since 2015. The property includes fountains, several buildings and a church. Through her limited liability company (LLC), Perry first offered to pay $14.5 million for the eight-acre estate to turn it into her private residence in Los Angeles. Details of a sale gone wrong But before she could go into escrow, the following things occurred that delayed the timely transfer of the property into her possession: Two nuns from the Sisters of the Most Holy and Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary made a quick deal with another private buyer. The sale to the second buyer closed quickly to prevent the sale by the archdiocese to Perry. The closed sale of the property did not have the necessary written approval from either the L.A. archdiocese or the pope, ultimately rendering it an invalid transaction. A Los Angeles Superior Court ruled against the nuns, yet the local archdiocese says that this is ultimately the best outcome for them. While this interesting case did technically pit the nuns against the archdiocese, the voided transaction came with only a small initial payment. The second buyer initially paid the nuns $44,000 and signed a promissory note for the rest, about $9 million. According to details known about the case and the terms of the contract, the invalid sale did not necessarily guarantee that the sisters would have ever received the rest of the amount owed. How you can avoid similar complications It is not every day that a dispute over a real estate transaction involves a group of nuns and a well-known pop star, but this case underlines the importance of working closely with an attorney to avoid similar complications. You or your business would be wise to approach the purchase and sale of valuable and complex properties only with qualified legal guidance and protective contractual provisions. A careful drafting and review of any contract is a positive effort toward avoiding disputes and legal complications that may prevent you from reaching your legal objectives.

Real estate dispute may involve easement Part I

An easement is a property right providing the holder of the right an interest in the land of another individual. These types of rights have an influence on various kinds of real estate transactions. In some cases, a real estate dispute may erupt in Los Angeles or in another California city over an easement. An example of a living situation involving an easement is if the only way to get to one’s home is through a driveway that crosses a neighbor’s property. An easement is typically created through conveyance in a property deed or in another type of document — for example, a contract or will. Creating an easement usually requires an instrument that is written, a signature and then the appropriate delivery of such a document. Following the creation of an easement, questions usually crop up about the scope of the easement, its location or its dimensions. The questions have to be addressed case by case, being affected by how the easement was created. If the written documents that created easements are incomplete or vague, thus leading to imprecise inferences based on the prior use of the properties, courts must be relied on to construe the intent of those produced the written documents. Many people in Los Angeles and elsewhere in California do not understand easements. For this reason, legal problems involving the drafting as well as the interpretation and implementation of documents related to easements may arise. It is within people’s rights to seek their best interests when a real estate dispute involving an easement leads to a lawsuit in the Golden State. Source: findlaw.com, “ Easement Basics “, Accessed on Feb. 1, 2017

Real estate dispute may involve easement Part I

An easement is a property right providing the holder of the right an interest in the land of another individual. These types of rights have an influence on various kinds of real estate transactions. In some cases, a real estate dispute may erupt in Los Angeles or in another California city over an easement. An example of a living situation involving an easement is if the only way to get to one’s home is through a driveway that crosses a neighbor’s property. An easement is typically created through conveyance in a property deed or in another type of document — for example, a contract or will. Creating an easement usually requires an instrument that is written, a signature and then the appropriate delivery of such a document. Following the creation of an easement, questions usually crop up about the scope of the easement, its location or its dimensions. The questions have to be addressed case by case, being affected by how the easement was created. If the written documents that created easements are incomplete or vague, thus leading to imprecise inferences based on the prior use of the properties, courts must be relied on to construe the intent of those produced the written documents. Many people in Los Angeles and elsewhere in California do not understand easements. For this reason, legal problems involving the drafting as well as the interpretation and implementation of documents related to easements may arise. It is within people’s rights to seek their best interests when a real estate dispute involving an easement leads to a lawsuit in the Golden State. Source: findlaw.com, “ Easement Basics “, Accessed on Feb. 1, 2017

Contact Us

Fill out this form below and we'll contact you shortly
*Required Fields