Blog / Real Estate Litigation

What are the adverse possession rules in California?

Adverse possession traces its roots back to ancient legal systems where a medieval farmer tills the soil, plants crops and builds a modest cottage on a piece of land. Over time, the farmer’s descendants continue to work the land, generation after generation. Eventually, the land becomes synonymous with their identity. It’s not just a plot; it’s their legacy.

Fast-forward to modern times, and the concept remains relevant. A legal doctrine that allows a person to claim land ownership under certain conditions, adverse possession allows someone who occupies another’s land openly, notoriously, and continuously to eventually claim legal ownership. In California, as in many other jurisdictions, the rules for adverse possession require the claimant to meet specific criteria before they can gain legal title to the property.

Most people acquire property by purchasing it or inheriting it. However, some people aren’t in a position to acquire property that way. They might instead decide to lay claim to a vacant piece of land or even a house that’s sitting unoccupied. 

If someone occupying or using a piece of real estate does so long enough without the owner fighting back, the owner could potentially lose the property to the person living there without their permission. 

Adverse possession is the legal process by which a squatter or non-owner assumes legal ownership of a piece of property that previously belonged to someone else. How does adverse possession work in California?

FIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR ADVERSE POSSESSION

In California, the trespasser must successfully meet five conditions for adverse possession:

  1. Continuous possession: The trespasser must stake their claim and occupy the land without interruption for at least five years. However, that time frame increases to 20 years if the owner has a medical disability. The trespasser must physically use the property, whether performing improvements, living on it or cultivating it.
  2. Actual, open, and notorious possession: Rather than secretly occupying the land, the trespasser must be conspicuous, visible, unmistakable or impossible to ignore. It should be overt enough for the true owner to justifiably be concerned that someone occupies their property.
  3. Exclusive possession: The possession must be exclusive, meaning the claimant cannot share possession with strangers.
  4. Hostile claim: This doesn’t mean aggression or violence; hostility simply means the trespasser occupies the land without the valid owner’s permission.
  5. Pay property taxes: Rather than squatting, the occupier pays property taxes on the land.

THE CLAIM OF RIGHT

The “claim of right” essentially eliminates the need for the adverse possessor to show any specific intent regarding the property’s ownership. Instead, it focuses on the nature of the possession itself, which must be adverse to the true owner’s interests. If the occupier treats the land as their own for five years, under the conditions required by law, they may be able to perfect their title to the land through adverse possession, effectively converting their claim of right into actual ownership.

THE PERSON CLAIMING THE PROPERTY MUST LIVE THERE OPENLY FOR YEARS

For a squatter or non-owner occupant to establish an adverse possession claim to a property, they will need to openly take possession of the property and start using it. Only after five years of occupation is a claim of adverse possession possible. In fact, the person occupying the land has to not only live there but also pay taxes on the property. 

Once that occupying individual has met the obligation to stay at the property and pay taxes on it for five years, they can potentially go to court to seek ownership of the property. However, if the owner of record has a medical disability, that time frame increases to a full twenty years. 

FIGHTING ADVERSE POSSESSION

Property owners can protect themselves against adverse possession claims through frequent inspections and the timely eviction of any occupants there without permission. Learning more about real estate laws in California can help you protect your investment in your property.

Posted in:

Related Posts

Be careful before you turn a property into a live/work space

Live/work spaces have become increasingly popular in recent years – particularly in cities like Los Angeles where real estate prices are among the highest in the country. However, it’s not really a new concept. People have lived above their stores, bars, restaurants and other businesses for centuries. Zoning laws, however, are much stricter than they used to be. Cities have zoning laws in part to protect property values. Many areas are zoned strictly for residential or commercial use. They can also be zoned as historic areas or for industrial or agricultural use. Some do allow a combination of residential and commercial use, with certain limits, like what kind of business can be conducted. These are known as mixed-used zones. Can you let a tenant live in a space they rent for their business? What if you are renting out a commercial property and your renter asks to live there? They’ll pay you extra, and you’ll have someone there during the night, so this might actually be a deterrent to crime. But is that legal? It depends. It’s crucial to check the zoning ordinances for the area. If it’s zoned only for commercial property, you may be able to get a permit. However, you’ll need to check with your insurance company to determine whether your policy covers something that might go wrong. What happens if your tenant leaves something on the stove and starts a fire or lets the bathtub overflow? You might not be covered for the damage. If you go ahead and let a tenant live in a commercial space without getting the proper authorization, you risk fines if the authorities find out. Further, if your tenant is injured or killed by an intruder in the middle of the night, you could face civil and/or criminal liability if the space wasn’t meant for someone to live in. Whether you want to live in a commercial property you own or you’re considering letting a commercial tenant use their space to live and work in, it’s crucial to determine the zoning restrictions for your area. Trying to get around them can only lead to problems. If you are facing legal issues involving the misuse of commercial property for residential purposes (or vice versa), it’s important to seek experienced guidance.

Your L.A. commercial space: Should you lease or sell?

An article published on The Business Journals’ L.A. Biz website just this week highlighted how demand for industrial real estate has recently reached all-time highest levels here in Los Angeles. That same report chronicles how vacancy rates have hit the lowest rates they’ve ever been. The trend in L.A.’s real estate market may have you wondering whether you should sell your property off to a buyer that’s made the highest offer on your commercial property or capitalize on the low vacancies and high demand, and lease it out. There are a few different factors that you’ll want to weigh as you decide which option is ideal. Do you hold or sell your commercial real estate? In a situation like the one described on L.A. Biz, you’re aware that the high demand and low vacancy rates mean that you can command higher-than-average monthly rent. You can likely negotiate more terms in your favor as well. Continuing to lease your property may be ideal if you believe that your property will retain a similar value to what it is now, or it still has room to increase. If you have any inkling that the value may drop, then you may opt to let it go now when you can command a top-level offer. One factor that may render such a decision less than straightforward is if your commercial or industrial space is in a new development or emerging market. You might be able to command a much higher sales price at a later phase in the development or as it becomes more popular. On the flip side, if taking the risk of the property value declining as you watch your rent trickle in from the lease makes you uncomfortable, then there may be no time like now to sell off your space. You may end up with just as much if not more (in a far shorter time) by putting it up for sale, especially if an unexpected costly repair were to be needed if you were a landlord. Entering into a short-term lease while you closely monitor the market is also an option. No matter what choice you make, it’s imperative that you closely analyze any contract you sign. It’s important to familiarize yourself with procedural or tax obligations that accompany your transaction as well.

Understanding common landlord-tenant disputes and their causes

Owning a rental property is a great investment. However, it is not unusual for a landlord to get into a dispute with their tenant. A tenant may feel the landlord is too bossy or strict, while the landlord may discover that the tenant is anything but what they hoped they would be. Multiple factors can contribute to disputes between landlords and their tenants. These can range from violations of the terms of the lease contract to the use of the rental property for unintended purposes. Here are some of the common landlord-tenant disputes that you need to look out for. Rent payment issues Rent non-payment or delay is by far the most common trigger of landlord-tenant disagreements. Rent-related disputes can be caused by several factors, such as: When the tenant falls behind on rent or does not pay at all When the tenant starts sending bad checks or lying about rent payment When the landlord fails to follow through with routine repairs and maintenance resulting in the tenant withholding rent Tip: To help address the issue of rent payment, the landlord can clarify when the rent should be due and what is considered late payment in the lease contract. The tenant, on the other hand, has the duty to report any repair issues or potential emergency situations that may hinder them from paying rent on time. Habitability issues Legally, the tenant has the right to a habitable premise. This means that the landlord is obligated to keep the rental unit clean and habitable, along with timely repair of defective conditions and complying with health and safety codes for rental facilities. Habitability issues can become an item of conflict if the landlord believes their rental unit is habitable while the tenant feels otherwise. It is important that both parties are aware of the HUD guide on premise habitability. Every landlord dreams of a trouble-free tenant who pays their rent on time and lives at peace with their neighbors. Every tenant, on the other hand, hopes for an understanding landlord who honors their end of the bargain and keeps the premise in a habitable condition. Understanding the common causes of landlord-tenant disputes can help both parties get into a contractual agreement that works for everyone.